------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 12:30 -------
One minimal fix for this is the following (patches for this I sent many times
long time ago, but poking in the C frontend is tedious):
Index: c-typeck.c
===================================================================
*** c-typeck.c (revision 117629)
--- c-typeck.c (working copy)
*************** build_unary_op (enum tree_code code, tre
*** 3032,3046 ****
}
/* For &x[y], return x+y */
! if (TREE_CODE (arg) == ARRAY_REF)
{
tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0);
if (!c_mark_addressable (op0))
return error_mark_node;
! return build_binary_op (PLUS_EXPR,
! (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
! ? array_to_pointer_conversion (op0)
! : op0),
TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), 1);
}
--- 3032,3044 ----
}
/* For &x[y], return x+y */
! if (TREE_CODE (arg) == ARRAY_REF
! && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0))) != ARRAY_TYPE)
{
tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0);
if (!c_mark_addressable (op0))
return error_mark_node;
! return build_binary_op (PLUS_EXPR, op0,
TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), 1);
}
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940
