------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:24 -------
Confirmed, a regression from 4.1.2 which we accepted this but gave a warning
saying we don't implement the semantics yet. Since we accepted this with a
warning before and now reject it, I am going to say this is a regression.
Note I think Mike Stump's work in this area caused this bug but I am not 100%
for sure.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |blocker
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Known to fail| |4.2.0
Known to work| |4.1.2
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-19 03:24:24
date| |
Summary|Strictly conforming code |[4.2 Regression] Strictly
|rejected |conforming code rejected
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29129
