------- Comment #9 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 17:54 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > There might be problems if no matching set can be found in the current > > basic block. I'll have to think about how to best check for this. > > I'm currently leaning to add a field in struct deps for the head of the > > current basic block, and setting that field in sched_analyze. > > Why not use reg_last->sets? > AFAICT, reg_last[0].sets is live at that point.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28618
