------- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 18:25 -------
I would like to request that this bug to be reopened.
First, the test never failed on hppa*-*-linux*, so we now have two
XPASS's on this target. Second, between 15 and 17 August, the second
xfail for hppa*-*-* changed to an XPASS on hppa*-*-hpux*. Third,
there's no PR for the "-4B" offset that's still present on hppa*-*-hpux*.
PR 26726, which added the testcase, points to PR target/24669 as
the remaining issue for that issue. This is characterized as being
a target specific problem, namely that the a more complicated addressing
mode is cheaper than a simpler mode, leading ivopts to prefer the it.
The puzzle in my mind is that there is no obvious difference between
costs for hpux and linux in the PA backend.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27707
