------- Comment #12 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-09-06 15:36 ------- Here's the .102t.final_cleanup
;; Function f (f) f () { int D.1524; int D.1522; int D.1520; int t.0; <bb 2>: t.0 = (int) &t; D.1520 = (int) &t[1]; D.1522 = (int) &t[2]; D.1524 = (int) &t[3]; return {t.0, D.1520, D.1522, D.1524}; } The CONSTRUCTOR in the return incorrectly has the TREE_CONSTANT flag set. So the problem is somewhere in tree-ssa. One workaround/improvement might be for out-of-ssa to reconstitute the constructor back to a constant. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28915