------- Comment #32 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 11:37 -------
Just to be sure that between 7/24 and today we didn't speed up significantly:
"real" times for hashes100.c (x86_64-linux, Intel Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1GB RAM):
3.4.6 4.2-svn20060903 delta
-O0 0m1.618s 0m1.634s +1%
-O1 0m2.743s 0m5.175s +88%
-O2 0m4.686s 0m7.719s +65%
"real" times for infcodes100.c:
3.4 4.2-svn20060903 delta
-O0 0m3.040s 0m3.526s +16%
-O1 0m4.989s 0m8.871s +77%
-O2 0m8.375s 0m13.334s +59%
Given these numbers, I would stick with gcc3 if I were a kernel developer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
