------- Comment #14 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 20:12 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:29:38PM -0000, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > The problem appeared from r96653 to r96654; AFAICT this is the gcc-patches > posting for the associated patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01709.html Jan and Dan Berlin suggested that the right fix for this bug might be to not register the uncloned constructor with cgraph, only the clones. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574
