------- Comment #7 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-07-25 20:08 ------- Ahh, I've just found the Richard's patch submission posting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01065.html I agree with Andrew Pinski, I think my changes are the better fix.
We also need to investigate wether (unsigned int)round(x) is better implemented as (unsigned int)llround(x). For the time being, my patch doesn't perform this transformation, and using lround is unsafe. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28473
