------- Comment #2 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2006-07-20 17:57 -------
Subject: Re: emit_input_reload_insns secondary
reload handling is unsafe
Quoting pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 11:19
> -------
> Isn't this really fixed by the TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD target hook?
reload_adjust_reg_for_temp checks only the first hard register for suitability
wrt. NEW_CLASS.
I.e. we check TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (reg_class_contents[(int) new_class], regno) ,
but for a two-hard-reg register we'd also have to check
TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (reg_class_contents[(int) new_class], regno) .
AFAICT the other issues in this PR have been addresssed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194
