------- Comment #26 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 17:29
-------
Well, I don't like much the limiting of inlining in recursive functions (where
it is rather interesting)
and I can't convince myself that the second patch is safe (ie the cycle don't
have to be in consetuctive entries in the postorder I would say).
I will test patch that simply make the array GGC root....
Thanks for looking into this,
Honza
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882
