------- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-06-19 18:05 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Wow, fast reply! I hope you're successful :-) Maybe you could look at 
> STLPort 5.x, AFAIK it's "more" efficient in this case. It also has 
> other nice features like:

Ok, thanks, but certainly we are not going to look inside the headers,
plagiarism doesn't seem the way to go...


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28080

Reply via email to