------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:20 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I agree that since there is a reference to the specification in -fopenmp it is
> not necessary to do more to document OpenMP in our manual. (If we have
> extensions to OpenMP they should be documented, but that's another issue.)
The current situtation with OpenMP is not the same as the rest of the
documentation. "Extensions to the C Language Family" is were extensions to the
language STANDARD are documented, if they are not, then how would someone know
what the extensions are?
Also -fopenmp is not an option to control "Code Generation Conventions" but
instead the language which is accepted so it should be listed in "Options
Controlling C Dialect" (and maybe "Options Controlling C++ Dialect.").
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
Summary|[4.2 Regression] OpenMP |[4.2 Regression] OpenMP
|extensions to the C language|extensions to the C language
|is not documented |is not documented or
| |doumented in the wrong spot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
