------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 23:04 ------- (In reply to comment #6) It just seems bogus that it says %g and then goes on to do something different and not to take into account that strlod is allowed more than just the characters specified.
The other problem I see with the current specification is what happens if you have one of the other UTF-8 number systems also, it seems like it is going to break at the same time? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27904
