------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:33 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> I am not sure whether the code snippet is legal at all, but it should emit an
> error, not an ICE.
Klaus,
It is legal and should compile OK.
It is related to PR27554 and various predecessors, even though the symtoms are
somewhat different. I essence passing intrinsics as actual arguments is
somewhat broken.
I have put these onto a "look at as soon as possible list".
Thank you for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-06-05 20:33:07
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27900
