------- Comment #7 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-05-31 22:17 ------- Ok, makes sense. The strategy that made sense to me was "If I see a definition for something that obviously has to be at global scope, but is defined inside of a function, pop all the way out to global scope and continue, there must be a missing }". I have no idea how hard that is to implement though. If you think it's infeasible to implement or would confuse some other important case, then I'm ok with RESOLVED INVALID.
-Chris -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26058
