------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 06:33 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > This might be why it is undefined at compile time if the file does not end > > in a > > new-line or not :). > > However, GCC *does* supports this as an extension, hence the expected pedwarn.
It is not really an extension, just undefined at compile time which is diffferent than supporting. > > > I don't think that warning is that bogus. It is true too. > > Huh? The backslash-newline occur in the middle of a comment, not at the end > of > a file. so ... The standard requires that to be an backslash-newline even without the comment there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27750
