------- Comment #2 from subdino2004 at yahoo dot fr 2006-05-21 20:25 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is not a bug in GCC but with your distro changing the rules that are > always used.
Why should being unable to use local functions be an acceptable side-effect of prohibiting executable stack if there is known solution ? What would be wrong to provide it as an alternative - if not accepted as the default behaviour ? Or should it become a no-one's fault bug ? Ah, not bug, I mean problematic side-effect. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27702
