------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-05-03 00:08 -------
Hi Doug. I'm afraid that, everything considered - in particular the status of
the rope extension - we have to go with the ugly approach: things like
_Rope_iterator::_M_check() actively do change the object...


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-05-03 00:08:30
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27404

Reply via email to