------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-03 00:08 ------- Hi Doug. I'm afraid that, everything considered - in particular the status of the rope extension - we have to go with the ugly approach: things like _Rope_iterator::_M_check() actively do change the object...
-- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-03 00:08:30 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27404