------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 07:57 -------
I am thinking this is the ABI getting in the way of the C++ standard. In that
the secondary ~D() is getting in the way. The reason I say that is because it
worked with the old ABI in 2.95.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Known to fail| |3.0.4 4.0.0 4.1.0 3.4.0
| |3.3.3
Known to work| |2.95.3
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-30 07:57:28
date| |
Summary|Unexpected requirement for |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|usual deallocation function |Unexpected requirement for
| |usual deallocation function
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27141
