------- Comment #2 from Stefan dot Neis at kobil dot com 2006-04-26 21:59
-------
Subject: Re: Compiling OpenSSL gives invalid code??
Hi,
Sorry, any attempt to attach an additional comment in bugzilla results in an
error
message (Not allowed You tried to change the Assignee field from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to __UNKNOWN__, but only the assignee of the bug, or a
sufficiently empowered user may change that field.), although I definitely
_only_ filled in the field for comments and pressed the
commit button, so I'm answering by mail ... :-(
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 17:43
> -------
> Hmm, this was once reported as PR 4844 but the testcase that was provided was
> in fact undefined C.
I found PR 4844 as well, when looking whether or not the problem is already
known,
but I believe it is unrelated:
- PR 4844 reports a failure while using OpenSSL's BIGNUMs, while the
failure I'm seeing happens while running "shatest". I didn't check
the source in sufficient detail to guarantee it 100%, but I'm
reasonably sure that computing a hash value does _not_ involve
BIGNUMs.
- PR 4844 is reported against 3.0.2, here I'm talking about something
which is failing with 4.1.0.
Also, in the meantime, HP kindly provided a gcc-3.4.5 build
(hppa64-*-* just as for the 4.1.0 bild) and using this results in an
OpenSSL build which is passing "make test" just fine, so this seems
like a regression in 4.0 or 4.1, IMHO.
Best regards,
Stefan Neis
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27286
