------- Comment #6 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-04-25 14:09 -------
Paolo's fix looks good to me. The bugzilla PR shows that this is a 4.2
regression, probably due to the more aggressive RTL optimizations on mainline.
So I'll preapprove Paolo's fix for mainline (please post the version you
commit and a new testcase when you commit it).
As for 4.1, do we have an example of a failure or wrong code generation
against the branch? I can't tell from bugzilla whether this is safely
latent in 4.0 and 4.1, or just hasn't been investigated there yet
("known to work" is blank, but the summary only lists [4.2]).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27282
