------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-27 08:12 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> We ICE in
> Now, it is indeed questionable to put a non-POD into ro memory.  So I think
> this is INVALID - but let's see what others think.

The target should have rejected progmem and not placed const on the decl.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|c++                         |target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26883

Reply via email to