On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 12:40 +0000, mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 12:40 > ------- > one possible workaround would be to lower the ARRAY_REF's to indirect mem > refs, > which I don't track > >
Uh, no. We are in fact, trying to do the exact opposite in the future (keep things array ref as long as possible)
