------- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-07 18:16 -------
I think this was just fixed by David Daney:

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111815


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26073

Reply via email to