------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 20:16 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > But the point is that the build machinery should not attempt to build > those libraries/programs when ada is not part of --enable-languages, > not just when the ada directory is present or absent. The decision > should be based on --enable-languages, nto just absence or presence of > directory. But the language subdirectories has this information in config-lang.in. For an example ada/config-lang.in:
target_libs="target-libada" lang_dirs="gnattools" So What do you expect when removing the ada subdirectory? C++ has the same issue: target_libs="target-libstdc++-v3" And it has been this way since 2000: revision 1.8 date: 2000/12/12 20:28:51; author: aoliva; state: Exp; lines: +3 -1 branches: 1.8.2; 1.8.10; 1.8.12; * configure.in: Simplify language enabling/disabling code. * configure: Rebuilt. * ch/config-lang.in (target_libs): Set. (build_by_default): Set to no. * cp/config-lang.in (target_libs): Set. * f/config-lang.in (target_libs): Set. * java/config-lang.in (target_libs): Set. * objc/config-lang.in (target_libs): Set. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26259
