------- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-02-07 18:47 ------- I see here another missed optimization on x86-64.
float re(float _Complex a) { return __real__ a; } # gcc-4.1: re: movq %xmm0, -8(%rsp) movss -8(%rsp), %xmm0 ret we can use `movss %xmm0, %xmm0` here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26134