------- Comment #11 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-25 03:09 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 391] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors
"hhinnant at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ------- Comment #9 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-25 02:54 ------- | (In reply to comment #8) | > Changing to request for enhancement. The requested behaviour is a change | > in th working paper. Existing behaviour is what is required by the standard | > (even when it can be argued that checking for something that is elided is | > suboptimal.) | | Did you read comment 3? Yes. Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or not does not matter? -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950
