------- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 22:19
-------
I agree that this looks related to PR 16269.
In that PR, RTH suggests that the right way to fix this is for the front end to
be more explicit about the lifetime of the temporaries, which definitely seems
the best way to attack the problem. In theory, the middle-end could notice the
fact that the temporary is no longer used, but that would be much more complex.
I've set this to P2, as it does not result in wrong code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25505
