------- Comment #10 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-14 18:48 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Trouble parsing nested templated constructor calls
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 12:22 > ------- > Mark, > > Re. your comment #5, I think everyone respects your request that only the RM > sets priorities. But right now the RM fails to do so. I think that's an overly strong statement. I try to make a pass over the open bugs every few weeks. But, I will try to increase the frequency at which I do this. > In this case, you don't comment at all on a regression that you caused, until > Richard escalates the issue and sets the priority higher himself. Richard > reported the problem 12 days ago today. Do you think it is strange that > people > get annoyed with you if you cause regressions and then essentially disappear > for 12 days? I wish I'd been able to fix this more quickly, but there are certainly other regressions that have been open longer than 12 days. > Had it been someone else instead of you who caused this bug, > people would have reverted the patch causing this bug long ago. I don't think that's true; it's not that critical of a bug. However, we do have a process in place for reversions, and it's certainly reasonable to invoke that process if you think that's appropriate. In this case, however, it looked like Richard was not aware of the process. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25663
