------- Comment #11 from nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-11 15:38 ------- Hi Libor,
Oops- there was a condition where the new code could walk backwards into a previous block. Sorry about that. I have uploaded a revised patch which should not fall into this trap. It certainly works with the two other test cases you provided. Cheers Nick -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24376
