------- Comment #11 from nickc at redhat dot com  2006-01-11 15:38 -------
Hi Libor,

  Oops- there was a condition where the new code could walk backwards into a
previous block.  Sorry about that.  I have uploaded a revised patch which
should not fall into this trap.  It certainly works with the two other test
cases you provided.

Cheers
  Nick


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24376


Reply via email to