------- Comment #7 from giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-12-24 21:53 ------- This is by design. It's out typeof() implementation works. It has pros and cons. See this link (and followups) for papers about this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg01642.html -- giovannibajo at libero dot it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10243
