------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-09 11:37 -------
This is not a bug: see 8.5.3/5. Roughly, when you have an rvalue (like
NonCopyable()) it's implementation defined whether the constructor is called,
and, in any case, "The constructor that would be used to make the copy shall be
callable whether or not the copy is actually done".
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25325
