------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 16:52
-------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Really, I wonder why code specific for C++ language support (and even more:
> specific for gcc) should be in glibc? May be the better place is one of
> crt*.o?
It is not specific to GCC, it is a standard C++ ABI defined by a committee (and
across multiple compilers now), it is the IA64 C++ ABI which is used by more
than GCC and on more than just IA64.
Anyways this is a bug in glibc.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24189
