------- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 02:09 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I've made a small amount of headway on this.
>
> Labels L22 and L21 were (when created) the addresses of objects in the code.
> However, they are deleted (presumably as unreachable), but the references to
> the
> lables persist.
>
> This is presumably exactly the case that RTH believed couldn't happen when he
> mentioned this in his email here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg00881.html
>
> and the reason we don't abort on ARM is that we never call
> output_constant_pool
> since we roll our own mini-pools.
>
> I've sofar been unsuccessful in reducing the testcase to something more
> managable.
Have you been able to track this with RTH?
Do you care about this bug be fixed for 3.4.5?
We're in 3.4.6 pre-release business now.
-- Gaby
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org,
| |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15231
