------- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-11-18 15:23 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I should note that 
> ld.acq+cmpxchg.rel is a full barrier.
> as noted in ia64.c so a mf is not required.

Did you read the last message from Alexander on the libstdc++ mailing list, in
particular the last paragraph?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24757

Reply via email to