------- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 22:54
-------
would this snippet be ok?
Index: ltcf-c.sh
===================================================================
--- ltcf-c.sh (revision 107140)
+++ ltcf-c.sh (working copy)
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@
hardcode_direct=no
hardcode_automatic=yes
hardcode_shlibpath_var=unsupported
- whole_archive_flag_spec='-all_load $convenience'
+ whole_archive_flag_spec=''
link_all_deplibs=yes
;;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909
