------- Comment #17 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2005-11-16
09:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] f2c miscompilation
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 09:39
>-------
>Is the second reduced testcase not fine from a standards POV? I.e.
>
>void abort(void);
>int main()
>{
> int a[10], *p, *q;
> q = &a[1];
> p = &q[-1];
> if (p >= &a[9])
> abort ();
> return 0;
>}
>
>or does "array" in the standard refer to q[0]..q[8] here?
>
>
No, this is fine.
Paolo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24851
