------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 00:57 ------- No that was not my point. My point is that the type to the function agrument cannot be figured out by what you gave it and as defined by the standard. I don't have the references in front of me to figure out why this is invalid code. But IIRC it has to be a direct look of type and not an indirect one through another type.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24588
