------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 02:44
-------
With the first case given, I get a segfault on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
gcc version 4.1.0 20051025 (experimental)
$ cat diag.nml
&DIAGS
NAMES = 'ETAN' 'ETANSQ' 'DETADT2' 'PHIBOT' 'PHIBOTSQ' '' ''
'' '' '' '' '' '' ''
'' '' '' '' '' '' ''
'' '' '' ''/
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0073d86c in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x0021584e in nml_read_obj (nl=0x96293d0, offset=0)
at ../../../gccdev/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2008
#2 0x00216312 in *_gfortrani_namelist_read ()
at ../../../gccdev/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2297
#3 0x00219b6d in finalize_transfer ()
at ../../../gccdev/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1813
#4 0x00219c9b in *_gfortran_st_read_done ()
at ../../../gccdev/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1962
#5 0x08048864 in MAIN__ ()
#6 0x08048953 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfa29604)
at ../../../gccdev/libgfortran/fmain.c:18
I also found this while debugging the list_read.c on PR24416. I am not sure
these are related. I am working on the segfault now.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24459
