------- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 14:23 ------- Much better, only 8 remaining failures:
Running /home/eric/cvs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O0 (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O0 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O1 (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O1 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O2 (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -O3 -g compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -Os (test for excess errors) WARNING: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 -Os compilation failed to produce executable Undefined first referenced^M symbol in file^M cexpl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M ccosl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M csqrtl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M asinhl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M expl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M cosl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M erfcl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M cpowl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M csinl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M sqrtl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M coshl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M sinl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M atanhl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M clogl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M atanl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M logl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M sinhl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M erfl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M acosl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M cabsl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M acoshl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M tanhl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M tanl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M asinl /var/tmp//ccDZzOIe.o^M However I see that large_real_kind_2.F90 was added alongside the patch. What's the correct approach to fixing that? Enhancing again c99_functions? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24432
