------- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-18 21:40 
-------
This code is invalid.  (EDG rejects this code in its strictly conforming mode,
as well.)

We cannot support it without changing the meaning of conforming programs.

I don't see anything about this particular case which makes it "special"
relative to other places in which we've fixed the compiler and, as a
side-effect, made it somewhat more strict.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24425

Reply via email to