------- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 21:40 ------- This code is invalid. (EDG rejects this code in its strictly conforming mode, as well.)
We cannot support it without changing the meaning of conforming programs. I don't see anything about this particular case which makes it "special" relative to other places in which we've fixed the compiler and, as a side-effect, made it somewhat more strict. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24425