New test, known to fail with: "Tue Oct 11 22:12:26 UTC 2005".
Running
/home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/execute.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -Os

With the message in the .log being:
Executing on host: /home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/gcc/ /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/t\
estsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c gcc_tg.o  -w  -O2 
-fno-show-column  -isystem /home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/mmix-\
knuth-mmixware/./newlib/targ-include -isystem
/home/hp/combined/combined/newlib/libc/include
-L/home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/ld \
-B/home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/mmix-knuth-mmixware/./newlib/
-L/home/hp/combined/mmixware-sim/mmix-knuth-mmixware/./newlib -Wl,\
--defsym,__Stack_start=0x1680a00000000000  -Wl,-wrap,exit -Wl,-wrap,_exit
-Wl,-wrap,main -Wl,-wrap,abort -lm   -o /home/hp/combin\
ed/mmixware-sim/gcc/testsuite/frame-address.x2    (timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c compilation,  -O2
^M
*** EXIT code 4242^M
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2

(signalling an abort or similar)
As __builtin_frame_address is implemented by generic means on mmix-*, I guess
some may want to set category "target" for this PR.  Whatever, it's just a
temporary setting until further analysis is made.


-- 
           Summary: testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
                    -O2 and above
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24344

Reply via email to