Accessing members of base classes depending on template parameters from derived 
classes has to be done by postponing the name lookup onte the second phase of 
the standard c++ two phase name lookup (if I'm right about that). This means, 
one has to use dependent types, so you have to use scope resolution, this-> or 
a using declaration in order to access the member of the base class.

Example (this works):

template<typename T>
class Base
{
    static const int i = 0;
};
 
template<typename T>
class Derived : public Base<T>
{
    // For two phase name lookup.
    using Base<T>::i;
 
    int foo() const  { return i; }
};


In order not to obfuscate bigger classes I heavily used using declarations as 
shown in the example above (instead of writing "return Base<T>::i;"). However 
using a static const integral out of a base class using a using declaration as 
a template parameter resulted in an internal compiler error:
internal compiler error: in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:4948

To reproduce the error compile this piece of code:

template<int i>
class X
{
};

template<typename T>
class Base
{
        static const int i = 0;
};

template<typename T>
class Derived : public Base<T>
{
        // For two phase name lookup.
        using Base<T>::i;

        X<i> member;
};


If I don't use a using declaration but write
    X<Base<T>::i> member;
instead of
    using Base<T>::i;
    X<i> member;
it works, though.

Thanks in advance

I'm using g++ 4.0.0 on Windows using these files
http://www.thisiscool.com/gcc_mingw.htm#gcj40

However, I have exactly the same internal compiler error using MinGW's g++ 
3.4.2.

-- 
           Summary: Two-phase name lookup crash with "using" a static const
                    integer from a base class as template parameter
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: lichtwerk dot x at laposte dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23950

Reply via email to