------- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-09-12 01:14
-------
Well, you may think it's clear but I am am counter-example :-) Perhaps
"template parameter" (in the message) is a formal term in the language syntax
specification (who but acompiler maven would know that?), but I expected that
"template parameter" refered to the template parameters, not the template
argument specifications. That is, I thought (in the example) that it referred to
"T, true" in "void foo::g<T, true>() {}", rather than to "template<typename
T>".
That is, you know what the message means only if you already know what it means,
which is by definition a bad diagnostic.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23823
