------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-08 21:11 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Agreed. Likewise for deque::iterator, I suppose. I will work on this.
I meant set::iterator and map::iterator, actually: checked earlier today and forgot that deque is not affected. Anyway, consistency with the behavior of vector. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23781
