------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-07 19:37 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Unfortunatly I don't believe thats possible without passing extra > information by more template parameters, which would break binary > compatability.
In short, in my preliminary opinion, we can well envisage this assuming anything we do actually changes the signature of the constructor. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23767
