------- Additional Comments From jconner at apple dot com 2005-08-24 17:24 ------- (In reply to comment #8)
> Actually TREE_READONLY is correct and TREE_CONSTANT is incorrect to use this > context (there was a > discussion about this before but I cannot find it). > TREE_CONSTANT is not set by the way on "static const" variables in C anyways, > only TREE_READONLY. Your second sentence is consistent with my (admittedly naive) understanding - that TREE_READONLY represents whether the value is declared constant, and TREE_READONLY represents whether the value actually changes. Sorry if this has been hashed out already - I thought I would put down what I've seen in case it hadn't been looked into yet. I'll search the web archives to see if I can find that previous discussion. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23237
