------- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2005-08-15 15:18 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] build_range_check generates wrong code for funcptr comparison
>>1) gcc should not be canonicalizing constants casted as function pointers > > I think it has to. GCC has no way of knowing whether the constant is > a "real" function pointer or not. Doesn't this break __cffc completely? What if I really wanted to do "if (fptr == (func_t)-2)" or "if (fptr == (func_t)5000)? randolph -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23369
