------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-08-09 17:28 ------- Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>)
"adah at netstd dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (In reply to comment #63) | > | Do *you* like it? | > It is immaterial as far as GCC is concerned. I know where to raise | | Why immaterial? Because we have a standard. If you want to change the standard, pleae do so. GCC bugzilla is the erong place. You're not helping your cause here. | I just cannot imagine anybody that *likes* this behaviour. That is orthogonal to GCC bugs. | If no one likes it, how can you call it reasonable behaviour Please your words and don't credit me for things I did not say. | (just because a | C++ god nodded)? If it is not reasonable behaviour, why can't you accept that | it is a bug? A bug in *what*? That seems to the issue you seem incapable to understand. | > such issues and I've suggested you do the same. You seem not to | > understand that comp.lang.c++.moderated and comp.std.c++ are the | | I posted about one day ago on comp.std.c++. No one answered. Impatience will not help you. | I do not know | any better way to contact anybody that might be in the committee. Do consider that committee members read comp.std.c++. Since you're not the center of the universe, do allow time and credit people for reading what you wrote. | > appropriate places. Insisting here will not help you. At this point, | | Reproaching me in this way won't help you, either. That is more a statement of fact that "reproaching". [...] | > the only thing you're doing here is sabotaging your own cause by | > frustrating people, who otherwise might be disposed to listen to and | | If you had not spoken in this kind of tones, which tone? You jumped in this discussion with the firm belief that it is a GCC bug, with NO understanding of the rules that govern the behaviour. And only reluctantly admitted an explanation of the behaviour. If you have a problem with GCC, I'm very happy to help you and I'll encourage other people to help you. If you want to be a pain in the ass treating people here as obscure ignorants, then you won't find my support. That is very simple. | I might have been much more considerate and constructive. And you do believe that being condenscending and non-constructive would help your cause? That would be very naive. | I just cannot understand why you have never shown any patience In effect, I've shown more patience and consideration than needed. I've always pointed you to the right place to discussion this issue, giving you hints to material your should digest before claiming this being a GCC bug. You've choosen not to consider them. I can't take blame for your deliberate choice to ignore advices. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
