------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 18:16 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > You may retartget this pr to fixing the silliness in libstdc++, if you want.
Paolo I copied the quote fully when I really should not have. RTH did not know we could not fix the if(0) part in libstdc++ at the time he wrote that comment, if you read the next comment in that bug I explain why it cannot be fixed in libstdc++ (comment #3 in PR 19699): (In reply to comment #2) > You may retartget this pr to fixing the silliness in libstdc++, if you want. Actually it is only silliness as try/catch is changed to be "if (true)"/"if (false)" if we don't have exceptions. There is nothing can be done to the libstdc++ headers to fix this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21951
